(This piece first appeared for a fortnightly column entitled 'The F Word: Lets Talk Feminism and Gender' that I write for The Weekend Express of News Express Ltd)
In September last year, two young Sri Lankan women were subject to cyber bullying after cosplaying Wonder Woman at the recently held Lanka Comic Con. The news spread widely through social media and thousands reached out to lend the women their support globally. The apex of support came from the movie's director Patty Jenkins as well as the actress who played Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) herself.
Image Courtesy HuffPost UK |
In September last year, two young Sri Lankan women were subject to cyber bullying after cosplaying Wonder Woman at the recently held Lanka Comic Con. The news spread widely through social media and thousands reached out to lend the women their support globally. The apex of support came from the movie's director Patty Jenkins as well as the actress who played Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) herself.
This
incident elicited news reports from dozens of websites and news sites,
including BBC, NDTV and Forbes. It has also been covered in languages other
than English. This story became the benchmark of how women face harassment and
violence online, and the conversation raged furiously as long as it was still a
sexy topic. But let us make no mistake, incidents like this are simply the tip
of the iceberg, and run into much darker and deeper waters. As Amalini de
Seyrah writes reflecting on just a few of the prominent activists who have
been subject to harassment in the recent past, "That’s not counting every
woman who has dared make a statement online, and then been targeted by
offensive memes, called a lesbian, a Social Justice Warrior (SJW) or had a
bunch of slurs thrown at her simply for standing for what she believed in.
We’re very aware of what happens in the bubble that is Twitter or Facebook, and
the abuse that goes on there is truly appalling. But worse, out there in the
world, women who work on truly amazing causes deal with threats of death and
violence. Very real threats of death and violence"
This and
other incidents of this nature I have come across in online travels keeps
following a similar formula – when attacking or critiquing a woman everything
is fair game, it is not just limited to their arguments and what they are
saying. And this is a tale as old as time, one that almost every woman who has
a public voice and scores of others besides have faced.
A very
senior women’s activist in Sri Lanka shared her experiences with me after
nearly 30 years of fighting very publicly for the advancements of womens rights.
She described the tropes that were used to describe her and other women she
worked with – that they were unmarried and therefore frustrated, that they
neglected their children, that they didn’t have familial relationships and that
is why they were hell bent on destroying other people’s families. It had nothing to do with the arguments they
presented, instead the focus was on tearing them down as people so that any
argument (no matter how well phrased and logical it was) was instantly deemed
invalid. Another women who worked in a newsroom talked about how she was told
to dress when going out into the field to be taken ‘seriously’. Another story
that was told to me by various women in various fields was that when they were
interviewed for a job they were constantly asked if they were planning on
getting married, when they were planning on having children etc. We hear of
women in service sector being told how they need to amend the length of their
skirts, pluck their eyebrows, the shade of lipstick to use – to appear
‘pleasant’. to None of these women were assessed or given an opportunity to
discuss their ability as was relative to their jobs – rather it was their lives
and choices that somehow were relevant and accepted as par for the course.
It is so
deeply rooted within us, that so many women end up championing and upholding
these patriarchal prerogatives that turn our choices, bodies, and lives into
fair game for public opinion and discussion. Patriarchy has done its job so
well that those who are oppressed by it can count themselves among its greatest
champions. Stockholm syndrome at its finest. Disbelieving? Think about it. Have
you ever come across an older woman in your workplace who takes it upon herself
to give you ‘advice’ in how you should dress, sit, stand, who you smile at and
how you talk to someone? All for your own good of course! Have you ever had a
friend who has ‘warned’ you about the type of pictures you shared on your
social media channels? Have you ever come across a group of women who gossip
about another woman based on how she lives her life? This is exactly what I am
talking about.
As Courtney Cook writes, “Though I had previously seen my
body as just a vehicle for who I was, it seemed my body had now become who I
was. As my body developed and the bodies of my classmates stayed stagnant, I
became the odd one out. By fourth grade I was labeled ‘fast’ and kids were told
to stay away from me, merely because I was more developed than them, and this
crushed me. It seemed my body was all anyone could focus on. At a conference in
fifth grade my teacher even stated to my parents “Courtney has cleavage,” and
all they could do was stare at him wide-mouthed and wonder if this had anything
to do with my education and progress (hint: it didn’t). It was just another
case of my body being critiqued, judged, and examined by everyone around me”
The media plays a huge role in perpetuating this – just
think about how female leaders globally are written about and portrayed.
Remember when British Prime Minister Theresa May and First Minister of Scotland
Nicola Sturgeon, were photographed in a meeting where they reportedly discussed
the possibility of Scottish independence and seen on the cover of the Daily
Mail with the headline "Never mind Brexit, who won Legs-It!" Whilst
discussing matters of global import, you see, they had both worn skirts. As
Elle Magazine wrote, “No one could reasonably argue that these women are only
notable for their bodies, or that they haven't earned the right to be taken
seriously. In fact, they enjoy a level of privilege most of us will never know.
And yet, in a moment, any random talking head or would-be witty newspaper
editor can reduce them to a collection of body parts to be evaluated by the
public. If it can happen to them, it can happen to anyone. And it does”
As feminists
often find themselves repeating – women are not a homogenous group, and so in
the same vein it is necessary to state at the outset that this applies (despite
neo-colonialist framing) to South Asia as well. Each country in South Asia has
its own trials and tribulations, history, and movements, but there is still a
great deal of shared experiences and values that allow for collective action
and advocacy. One of the key factors that several South Asian countries have is
a shared history of Colonisation, which has been primarily British and during
the Victorian era. This has led to several laws, cultural commonalities and a
struggle with identity. And perhaps one of the things we have embodies the best
are these Victorian values that police and control women, their choices, their
lives, and their sexuality. How far really have we moved from a time where long
table cloths were normal to hide the legs of the table which were deemed too
sensuous? You tell me.
The time is
well past for Sri Lanka and our education system to take a long, harsh look at
what it is that allows for this kind of sexism against women, and why young and
not-so-young men feel entitled to take it upon themselves to police and harass
women both online and offline. We need
to ask and begin to deconstruct the patriarchal notions that have made women’s
bodies and what they do with them a space for public discourse and opinion. We
need to be given the tools in an age-appropriate, culturally relevant context
to think critically and think of people as…well people. Radical notion as that
may be.
Comments